Medieval Ages v. Renaissance Culture

warmth remained a major theme in the Medieval and rebirth literary works unless this form of ro humannesstic passion is depicted differently is some(prenominal) eras. In the Medieval era, its takes the form of courtly bang and was labeled as a noble passion coupled with chivalry and gallantry. In renaissance, delight was similarly considered an ennobling phenomenon but we see concept of romantic and grand love that has nonhing to do with knightly and chivalrous qualities.In the trivial story of Equitan, courtly love is not depicted an immodest and lewd phenomenon but it is praised occasionally. It further shows certain other fine qualities of the contemporary culture. Equitan was not a usurper. Although being a king, he was able to keep his seneschals wife by force or decree but he took into account both the seneschal and his wifes feelings all over the issue. Following the tradition of courtly love, he discover his love for the gentle char and requested her hand. This understandably manifests that culture and value of time pertaining to courtly love strongly prohibited forced love.Furthermore, it shows the individual integrity and honesty inside the community. It was kings integrity and honesty that did not let him snitch his seneschal and adopt a proper way to court the lady. When Equitans disclosed his feeling for her, she requested time to ponder over the matter. This indirectly depicts the modestness level of the people in general and nobility in particular. baron was not swayed by the strong emotions and lady (seneschals wife) was not also seduced emotionally.Loyalty and equality were other ingredients of the courtly love that portrays the values and traditions of the participation as a whole. Seneschal wife says in this regard neck is not honourable, unless it is based on equality. A poor man, if he is sure and possess wisdom and merit, is of greater worth and his love more successful than that of a prince or king who lacks loyalty.T his further depicts that females were not considered an object of joyousness only. They have their own say in the amorous and domestic affairs. It was a two-way affair. All the short stories and primary sources clearly indicate that intemperance in courtly love was not considered a social satanic but was sanctioned by the society. People used to admire knights and mistresses involve courtly affairs.Although wealth and power was taken into account while do a courtly love to a man or woman but chiefly it was beauty and merits on the part of the woman and man that were considered as the pre-requisites for courtly love. For example the Lady Love in letter of Abelard and Heloise describes two special gifts whereby to win at once the hearts of each woman of her male lover. Those are his gifts for composing verse and song and his human beings. This shows that contemporary community was not too materialistic in the affairs of love.Letters of Abelard and Heloise clearly manifest that marriage was not the objective or outcome of courtly love. The objective was to involve in the fine and subtile passion and feel the delicacies of the excitement. Mistress was considered more adorable title than that of wife.The spiritual rebirth was usually the Age of Idealism the concept of love was also change and it was associated with unearthlyity. However we find juxtaposing view about the concept of love in the long period of Renaissance. For example in The Merchants Tale, Chaucer does juxtapose musical style of courtly love and religion against each other and mocks both of them.unlike precepts of courtly love are satirized by characterization and are undermined to an accomplishment by effective utilization of images, descriptions and tone that it seems comical and illogical. So a phenomenon, courtly love that was eulogized in the gothic period is mocked. This poem, as it were, holds a mirror to the life of Chaucers age and shows it manners and morals completely, so it is obvious that lovers were always disliked and condemned by their families and societies in the renaissance period.Petrarch (1304-1374) is considered the maiden writer of the Renaissance takes into account the idealized form of love. Unlike medieval concept of courtly love, romantic love of renaissance literature was spare of sexuality and eroticism. Petrarch shows the pangs of love and labels it as deadly disease or wound. He says in this regardWeeping I laugh, I feed on misery, by death and life so equally dismayed for you, my lady, am I in this state.(Sonnet, 134, Translation)Beloved is an exalted female routine that has nix to do with materialistic world. But she was a more realistically conceived and presented figure than in the literature of courtly love. So above-mentioned arguments and evidence clearly show that concept of love was different in both periods. atomic number 53 was based on the desires of the flesh and feelings whereas other was based on its spiritual an d transcendental nature.ReferencesBrewer, Derek. Chaucer and his world. New York Dodd, Mead, 1978.Lewis, C. S. The Discarded Image An Introduction to Medieval and Renaissance Literature. Cambridge Cambridge University Press, 1964.Petrarca, Francesco. Petrarchs Songbook = Rerum Vulgarium Fragmenta. Trans. James Wyatt Cook. Binghamton MRTS, 1995.