'Evaluation of America’s Cultural Influence on the World\r'

'Evaluation of the States’s pagan Influence on the orb. Jacqueline Gargiulo LIM College Abstract Culturally and politically, the States has a strong jar on the bena. The kit and boodle of Matthew Parris and Raja Shehadeh portray offensive behavior by the united States which has impacted younger generations of Palestine and European Countries. Where Shehadeh’s work, What We Think of the States (2), indicates two an perceptiveness and anger towards the fall in states, Parris’s work, It’s age We All Signed Up for the symmetricalness of the World Team, outlines a definitive negative towards the the States and what it stands for.Both articles bring up that the United States had forced its ideals on to the pass off of the world. planetary perception round the United States seems to be generated both by the States’s violence and sour as well as from within the nations themselves. Parris refers to the United States as a hegemonic power tha t commands regnant in where Shehadeh takes a more intimate progress and discusses a personal exchange concerning a family division’s loss of original ethnicity. There ar many world-wide voices represented in these whole kit and caboodle; both decreed and negative aspects are explored.Evaluation The world has a mixed view of the States. The United States is often seen as a hegemonic empire that looks to control the rest of the world. Ameri faecal matter fashion, politics, media, and ideals are captivating to younger generations of remote countries. The works of Matthew Parris, a South African born(p) British political journa key, and Raja Shehadeh, a Palestinian attorney and author on international and kind-hearted rights and the Middle East, illustrate differing yet complementary views of America’s deflect on the rest of the world.While well-nigh believe that America has a positive impact on society, others feel that America strips them of their ethnicity and value system. atomic number 53 negative heathen influence that America has had on Palestinians is referenced in the paragraph by Shehadeh which reminisces near country men who leave for America and consecrate striped of their cultural dress and their ethnic accent. Shehadeh (2002) writes, â€Å" The rough who come back for brief summer visits present up and down Main Street in their Bermudas and baseball hats, stopping at the ice lap up parlour to reminisce with its proprietor in an sr. accent that you hardly ever hear in Ramallah today” (pg. 1). Shehadeh portrays admiration for the United States in obligingness to their advances in transportation and efficient laneways in Ramallah, Palestine, speckle at the same time discusses the destruction to the states inhering beauty and heritage. This is evidenced when Raja (2002) states â€Å"Next came the need for new roads to connect them to Israel; not the doddery British-style tautdering roads alone American -style straight four-lane highways that cut through the hills that stood in the way” (pg. 92).Shehadeh (2002) continues to excuse that â€Å" in the context of the Middle East conflict, roads may seem a small thing, but they pass water done a kind of unearthly damage. Gone is that attractive stretch of serpentine road that meandered downhill…” (pg. 92). Here, as America pushed its cultural influence upon the Middle East, geographic beauty has been lost and in its place convenience of travel has been placed. Hence, Raja Shehadeh’s everyplaceall view of America is mixed. Matthew Paris’s work can be viewed as extremist. His overall view of America and its cultural influence is negative.Parris (2003) explains, â€Å" right away there is only one hegemon, the United States of America; but there is no less a need than existed during the C onetime(a) War for a suspect defensiveness towards the appetite, the pretensions, and the dreams of a great and u nchallenged power. If the U. S. eagle is to be contained, collective action is needed by the littler mammals” (pg. 94). Here, Parris is proclaiming that America is a dominating influence over other nations and if they are to come out from on a lower floor the influence of this overarching power, they must unite or be consumed.Matthew Parris (2003) furthers his argument by writing that â€Å"As America grows more confident and its muscle and command, it will be clashing again and again, not just with old enemies but with former friends-over trade, the environment, â€Å"pre-emptive” deference, regime change, international law, extradition… the list is speculative, but let us speculate. ” (pg. 96) . Parris uses the example of Britain’s own Prime Minister Tony Blair, who positiond with the United States sooner of standing on his own two feet. Tony Blair estimate the duad could be repaired and that he might be the bridgemaker. Now, he marooned on the other side and will have to take his chances there” (Parris, 2003, pg. 97). Here, America seems to turn its back on Britain by alleviating the bridge that bound them, leaving Tony Blair and his country helpless. America is incontrovertible that they can repair the bridge when necessary, but for the mean time, make no attempts to do so. Parris also exposes America’s ambiguity over the war with Iraq. â€Å" It is, thus far; just possible that failure will be faced.The peace in Iraq may prove dirtier than the war, and the American people ( as distinguished from their Defense Secretary) are ambivalent about empire and squeamish about becoming other nations’ policeman…” (Parris, 2003, pg. 95) Parris is trying to describe us here that the United States has stepped beyond it bounce and is now responsible to take care of Iraq citizens. He further explains that the U. S. will have more responsibility for the well being of Iraq’s people because of the actions we have taken to stop the Iraq war.In conclusion, Matthew Parris is suggesting that the United States needs to be reigned in and that if this does not occur the â€Å"hegemonic power”, that is the United States will take over and scram insoluble. With this, Matthew Parris’s view on America’s cultural influence on the world is overpoweringly negative. The international perception of the United States as an imposing, and influential power can be seen as either a negative or a positive. Because of its global connotation, it has become a source of analysis and scrutiny.Negatively, the United States is seen as a â€Å"hegemony” that needs taming and â€Å"caging”. Contrastingly, and on a positive note, the United States is influencing trade, transportation, economy, and education. America is influencing these factors towards other countries to try to rear there knowledge and to further expose them to the possibilities that can be achieved by taking on the American way. One cannot view America’s positives as having no merit. There may be some form of jealousy that is masked by capitalizing on the negative power that is exerted by the United States. In onclusion, America’s cultural influence is chiefly mixed as seen in the works of Matthew Parris’s It’s Time We All Signed Up for the Rest of the World Team, along with Raja Shehadeh’s What We Think of America (2). References: Gumery, K. , (2007) International Views: America and the Rest of the World. Glenview, Ill: Pearson Education, Inc. Parris, Matthew, (2003) â€Å"It’s time we all write up for the rest of the world team” In Keith Gumery (Ed. ), International Views (pg. 94-97). New York: Pearson Longman Shehadeh, Raja, (2002) â€Å"What we think of America (2)” In Keith Gumery (Ed. ), International Views (pg. 90-93). New York: Pearson Longman\r\n'