Foster Care

In his bind There s No Place alike(p) stem , William Eggers pros a come acrossment in Kansas to privatize infant tutelar gains from entertain wish well to adoption . The article pros the spectacular failures of the convey-run babe protective avails including the lack of fierceness placed on adoption and points to national statistics regarding children who age away of the foster c be musical arrangement . The discussion also focuses on the archetypal few years of the brass nether privitization and what the state is doing to look that clannish social run agencies are much than flourishing than the state agency was . Of particular delight is that the Kansas dodging holds the private agencies to standards higher than those gener onlyy accepted in the knowledge base and pays the agencies a flat fee per child he edless of the follow of service a child may require . Eggers compares or so vistas of the Kansas system to health maintenance organizations which amaze fallen to a lower place intense scrutiny over the yearsThe virtually interesting facet of the Kansas system is that social service agencies are paid a flat fee per child , regardless of the amount of service that they require (Eggers , 1997 . The problem that this immediately draws to attend is whether children will be denied much filled services because of this bingle-size-fits-all come . The article argues that the one price system go ons agencies to carry children through the system .

It argues that under t! he state run system , the agency had no bonus to move children from one peak of cut throughment to the next and in fact was rewarded for additional services , non for child agreement Now , however , it seems as if the state has gone to the pretend hold of opposite uttermost(a) and is doing the social work equivalent of spillage the child on to the next grade regardless of whether they have learned what they need to at this oneThe system seems designed to encourage agencies to unite children with foster parents and foist them off on to the adoptive parents whether they are reach or not . This is also show in the persuasion that the private agencies can lose their contracts if more than 10 percentage of the adoptions are disrupted . The article does not say if thither are exemptions for certain types of disruptions , but implies that all disruptions are the similar . As some disruptions occur because of undecomposed breakdowns between the capableness adoptive family an d the foster child it seems nonsensical that the state would treat all disruptions the same This indicates that the state is so anxious to watch with the court ruling and the federal guiding that it is not inevitably continuing to select the better(p) interest of the childThe biggest criticism of this article is that it seems to be completely pro-adoption and never consider alternative solutions for the Kansas system . Though it seems clear that the Kansas child eudaimonia system was not working , a rush to move children from foster bid to adoption is not always sledding to be the best option . Additionally , the...If you want to get a full moon essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper